§ The result
PageUp leads Interviewer.AI on all 7 criteria.
PageUp finishes 17 points clear of Interviewer.AI under rubric v1.0 — 64 (D) against 47 (F) — across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; Interviewer.AI leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Interviewer.AI 35, PageUp 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 47% of the weighted advantage PageUp holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
Interviewer.AI is filed under Video interview AI, PageUp under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Interviewer.AI is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Interviewer.AI | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | SG | AU |
| Founded | 2018 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Interviewer.AI 35 · PageUp 80
8.1 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Interviewer.AI 52 · PageUp 74
4.4 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Interviewer.AI 32 · PageUp 55
2.8 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Interviewer.AI 35 · PageUp 40
0.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Interviewer.AI 60 · PageUp 64
0.5 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Interviewer.AI 60 · PageUp 63
0.4 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Interviewer.AI 58 · PageUp 63
0.4 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -17.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Interviewer.AI minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | Interviewer.AI | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 74 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 80 | -45 | -8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 63 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 55 | -23 | -2.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 63 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 64 (D) | -17 | -17.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Interviewer.AI | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 46 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next