§ The result
Pinpoint leads Interviewer.AI on all 7 criteria.
Pinpoint sits 10 points above Interviewer.AI under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 47 — with Pinpoint filed under ATS-integrated and Interviewer.AI under Video interview. Pinpoint leads every one of the 7 criteria, Interviewer.AI none of them, and the closest of the 7 is FRIA Support, Interviewer.AI 35 to Pinpoint 38. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Interviewer.AI 52, Pinpoint 72, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage Pinpoint holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Vendor profile
Pinpoint
Pinpoint is an applicant tracking system for in-house talent teams that layers AI-assisted screening onto core hiring workflows - candidate match scores, AI filters, anonymized screening, an interview notetaker, and a hiring copilot for outreach and rejections.
§ The record
Interviewer.AI is filed under Video interview AI, Pinpoint under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Interviewer.AI is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Interviewer.AI | Pinpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | SG | JE |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Interviewer.AI 52 · Pinpoint 72
4.0 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Interviewer.AI 32 · Pinpoint 52
2.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
18% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Interviewer.AI 35 · Pinpoint 42
1.3 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Interviewer.AI 60 · Pinpoint 68
1.2 weighted points to Pinpoint
8% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Interviewer.AI 58 · Pinpoint 66
0.6 weighted points to Pinpoint
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Interviewer.AI 60 · Pinpoint 64
0.5 weighted points to Pinpoint
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Interviewer.AI 35 · Pinpoint 38
0.4 weighted points to Pinpoint
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -10.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Interviewer.AI minus Pinpoint.
| Category | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Pinpoint | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 72 | -20 | -4.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 68 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 64 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 52 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 57 (F) | -10 | -10.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Pinpoint | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pinpoint has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Pinpoint, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pinpoint last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next