§ The result
Interviewer.AI leads Recruit CRM by 7 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Interviewer.AI, filed under Video interview, finishes on 47 and Recruit CRM, filed under ATS-integrated, on 40, 7 points apart. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Interviewer.AI: Interviewer.AI is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Recruit CRM on Post-Market Monitoring. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Interviewer.AI 52, Recruit CRM 34 — and at a 20% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Interviewer.AI
Interviewer.AI is an asynchronous AI video interview platform that pre-screens and scores candidates by analyzing recorded video responses and resumes against role-specific success factors, producing an "AI Score" breakdown to help recruiters shortlist.
Vendor profile
Recruit CRM
Recruit CRM is an ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies and executive search firms, with AI resume parsing, AI sourcing from an 800M+ profile Global Database, and AI candidate matching that scores and ranks candidates 0–100 with explanations for each dimension.
§ The record
Interviewer.AI is filed under Video interview AI, Recruit CRM under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Interviewer.AI is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Interviewer.AI | Recruit CRM |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | SG | US |
| Founded | 2018 | Not recorded |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Interviewer.AI 52 · Recruit CRM 34
3.6 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
18% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Interviewer.AI 35 · Recruit CRM 20
2.7 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Interviewer.AI 32 · Recruit CRM 42
1.2 weighted points to Recruit CRM
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Interviewer.AI 60 · Recruit CRM 54
0.9 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Interviewer.AI 60 · Recruit CRM 58
0.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Interviewer.AI 58 · Recruit CRM 60
0.2 weighted points to Recruit CRM
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Interviewer.AI 35 · Recruit CRM 34
0.1 weighted points to Interviewer.AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +6.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +6.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Interviewer.AI minus Recruit CRM.
| Category | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Recruit CRM | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 34 | +18 | +3.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 20 | +15 | +2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 34 | +1 | +0.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 60 | 54 | +6 | +0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 32 | 42 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 60 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 47 (F) | 40 (F) | +7 | +6.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Interviewer.AI | Recruit CRM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 30 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruit CRM has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Recruit CRM sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Recruit CRM, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Interviewer.AI last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruit CRM last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next