HomeCompareInterviewer.AI vs Retorio

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Interviewer.AI vs Retorio

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

3 points separate Interviewer.AI and Retorio.

Interviewer.AI (Video interview) edges Retorio (Assessment) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 47 to 44. Interviewer.AI leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while Retorio leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Interviewer.AI 60, Retorio 52, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 30% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Interviewer.AI is filed under Video interview AI, Retorio under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.

RecordInterviewer.AIRetorio
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersSGDE
Founded20182018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 24% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Interviewer.AI 60 · Retorio 52

    1.2 weighted points to Interviewer.AI

  2. 12% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Interviewer.AI 60 · Retorio 52

    1.0 weighted points to Interviewer.AI

  3. 18% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Interviewer.AI 35 · Retorio 40

    0.9 weighted points to Retorio

  4. 15% weight · 77% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Interviewer.AI 35 · Retorio 30

    0.8 weighted points to Interviewer.AI

  5. 8% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Interviewer.AI 58 · Retorio 50

    0.6 weighted points to Interviewer.AI

  6. 20% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Interviewer.AI 52 · Retorio 50

    0.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Interviewer.AI 32 · Retorio 33

    0.1 weighted points to Retorio

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +2.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +2.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Interviewer.AI minus Retorio.

CategoryWeightInterviewer.AIRetorioΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5250+2+0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3540-5-0.9
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%6052+8+1.2
Human Oversight Design12%6052+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3233-1-0.1
Customer Documentation8%5850+8+0.6
Total100%47 (F)44 (F)+3+2.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightInterviewer.AIRetorio
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%126Sources on the vendor's own domain166Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Retorio has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Retorio sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 40 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for Retorio, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Interviewer.AI last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Retorio last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.