HomeCompareInterviewer.AI vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Interviewer.AI vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Interviewer.AI leads Talview by 5 points.

Interviewer.AI scores 47 and Talview 42 under rubric v1.0 — a 5-point gap inside the Video interview cohort. Interviewer.AI leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while Talview leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Interviewer.AI 60, Talview 48, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage Interviewer.AI holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Interviewer.AI and Talview are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Assessment and Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.

RecordInterviewer.AITalview
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersSGUS
Founded20182012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 34% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Interviewer.AI 60 · Talview 48

    1.8 weighted points to Interviewer.AI

  2. 15% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Interviewer.AI 35 · Talview 25

    1.5 weighted points to Interviewer.AI

  3. 12% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Interviewer.AI 60 · Talview 55

    0.6 weighted points to Interviewer.AI

  4. 18% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Interviewer.AI 35 · Talview 38

    0.5 weighted points to Talview

  5. 8% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Interviewer.AI 58 · Talview 52

    0.5 weighted points to Interviewer.AI

  6. 20% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Interviewer.AI 52 · Talview 50

    0.4 weighted points to Interviewer.AI

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +4.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Interviewer.AI minus Talview.

CategoryWeightInterviewer.AITalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5250+2+0.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3538-3-0.5
FRIA Support15%3525+10+1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%6048+12+1.8
Human Oversight Design12%6055+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%3232--
Customer Documentation8%5852+6+0.5
Total100%47 (F)42 (F)+5+4.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightInterviewer.AITalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%126Sources on the vendor's own domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

Interviewer.AI has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 18 for Interviewer.AI, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Interviewer.AI last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.