§ The result
Jobylon leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Jobylon finishes 17 points clear of Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 31 — across the ATS-integrated and Video interview cohorts. Jobylon leads every one of the 7 criteria, Intervue.io none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, Intervue.io 54 to Jobylon 60. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Intervue.io 28, Jobylon 55, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 32% of the weighted advantage Jobylon holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Jobylon
Jobylon is a Stockholm-based applicant tracking system and talent CRM for enterprise employers whose optional AI features score each applicant's CV against the job description, suggest existing candidates for other open roles, draft job ads and screening questions, and run candidate screening and interview scheduling over WhatsApp, SMS and email.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Jobylon under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | Jobylon |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | SE |
| Founded | 2020 | 2011 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Jobylon 55
5.4 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Jobylon 58
3.0 weighted points to Jobylon
18% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Jobylon 28
2.9 weighted points to Jobylon
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Jobylon 36
2.1 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Jobylon 45
1.8 weighted points to Jobylon
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Jobylon 60
0.8 weighted points to Jobylon
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Jobylon 60
0.7 weighted points to Jobylon
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 16.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -16.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Jobylon.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Jobylon | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 55 | -27 | -5.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 28 | -16 | -2.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 36 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 58 | -20 | -3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 60 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 48 (F) | -17 | -16.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Jobylon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Jobylon has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 70 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Jobylon, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Jobylon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next