§ The result
Lever leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Lever (ATS-integrated) opens an 18-point lead on Intervue.io (Video interview), 49 to 31. Intervue.io leads none of the 7 criteria, and Lever is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. The advantage Lever holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 12, Lever 42, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 30% of the weighted points Lever gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Lever
Lever is an AI-powered applicant tracking system and recruiting CRM that centralizes sourcing, candidate relationship management, AI candidate matching (Talent Fit), and hiring analytics for high-growth employers.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Lever under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | Lever |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 30% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Lever 42
5.4 weighted points to Lever
20% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Lever 52
4.8 weighted points to Lever
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Lever 58
3.0 weighted points to Lever
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Lever 45
1.8 weighted points to Lever
15% weight · 92% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Lever 32
1.5 weighted points to Lever
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Lever 60
0.7 weighted points to Lever
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Lever 58
0.6 weighted points to Lever
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Lever.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Lever | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 52 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 42 | -30 | -5.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 32 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 58 | -20 | -3.0 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 60 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 45 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 58 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 49 (F) | -18 | -17.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Lever | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 13 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Lever has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 13 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and Lever sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Lever, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Lever last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next