§ The result
Ribbon leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Ribbon sits 12 points above Intervue.io under rubric v1.0 — 43 against 31 — with Ribbon filed under Screening and Intervue.io under Video interview. Of the 7 criteria Intervue.io wins none, and the narrowest lead Ribbon holds is on Human Oversight Design, Intervue.io 54 to Ribbon 55. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Intervue.io 12, Ribbon 38, 18% weight), but it accounts for only 37% of the weighted advantage Ribbon holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Ribbon
Ribbon is an AI recruiter that runs voice and video screening interviews with applicants around the clock, scores each interview against default and custom rubrics, ranks candidates for recruiter review, and syncs the results to 60+ applicant tracking systems.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Ribbon under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | Ribbon |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | IN | CA |
| Founded | 2020 | 2020 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Ribbon 38
4.7 weighted points to Ribbon
20% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Ribbon 42
2.8 weighted points to Ribbon
15% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Ribbon 50
1.8 weighted points to Ribbon
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Ribbon 33
1.6 weighted points to Ribbon
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Ribbon 37
0.8 weighted points to Ribbon
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Ribbon 58
0.6 weighted points to Ribbon
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Ribbon 55
0.1 weighted points to Ribbon
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -12 beside that -12.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Ribbon.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Ribbon | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 38 | -26 | -4.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 33 | -11 | -1.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 50 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 55 | -1 | -0.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 37 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 58 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 43 (F) | -12 | -12.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Ribbon | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 31 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Ribbon has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and Ribbon sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 35 for Ribbon, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Ribbon last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next