§ The result
Tengai leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
Tengai, filed under Screening, comes out 11 points above Intervue.io, filed under Video interview: 42 against 31 under rubric v1.0. Tengai takes all 7 criteria and Intervue.io none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, Intervue.io 30 to Tengai 33. The advantage Tengai holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 12, Tengai 33, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 34% of the weighted points Tengai gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Tengai
Tengai runs structured screening interviews through a browser-based AI avatar and combines candidates' yes/no qualification answers, a Five-Factor-based personality score and recruiter ratings of open answers into an automatically ranked shortlist.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Tengai under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | Tengai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | SE |
| Founded | 2020 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Tengai 33
3.8 weighted points to Tengai
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Tengai 45
3.4 weighted points to Tengai
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Tengai 50
1.8 weighted points to Tengai
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Tengai 28
0.9 weighted points to Tengai
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Tengai 58
0.5 weighted points to Tengai
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · Tengai 55
0.4 weighted points to Tengai
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Tengai 33
0.4 weighted points to Tengai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Tengai.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Tengai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 45 | -17 | -3.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 33 | -21 | -3.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 50 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 58 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 33 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 55 | -5 | -0.4 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 42 (F) | -11 | -11.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Tengai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 37 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Tengai has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 37 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and Tengai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 79 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 42 for Tengai, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tengai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next