§ The result
Tezi leads Intervue.io on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Tezi (Screening) and Intervue.io (Video interview) are 27 points apart under rubric v1.0, 58 for Tezi against 31 for Intervue.io. Intervue.io is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Tezi takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is Human Oversight Design, Intervue.io 54 to Tezi 63. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Intervue.io 12, Tezi 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
§ The record
Intervue.io is filed under Video interview AI, Tezi under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Intervue.io is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Intervue.io | Tezi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | IN | US |
| Founded | 2020 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · Tezi 83
12.8 weighted points to Tezi
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · Tezi 52
4.8 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · Tezi 58
3.4 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · Tezi 55
2.5 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · Tezi 38
2.4 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · Tezi 63
1.1 weighted points to Tezi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -27.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -27 beside that -27.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus Tezi.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | Tezi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 52 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 83 | -71 | -12.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 38 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 63 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 58 | -28 | -3.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 58 (F) | -27 | -27.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | Tezi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | — |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io and Tezi sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next