§ The result
VidCruiter leads Intervue.io on all 7 criteria.
VidCruiter finishes 17 points clear of Intervue.io inside the Video interview cohort under rubric v1.0: 48 against 31. VidCruiter takes all 7 criteria and Intervue.io none of them; the nearest contest is Post-Market Monitoring, Intervue.io 30 to VidCruiter 33. The advantage VidCruiter holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Intervue.io 28, VidCruiter 58, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 35% of the weighted points VidCruiter gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Intervue.io
Intervue.io runs outsourced, recorded technical interviews through a network of vetted engineer-interviewers and also sells AI screening: an agent that phones or interviews candidates by voice or avatar and returns scored summaries, AI scoring of resumes and recorded video answers, and a built-in ATS.
Vendor profile
VidCruiter
VidCruiter is an enterprise recruitment platform combining live and pre-recorded video interviewing, structured interview workflows, automated scheduling, skills testing, automated reference checks, and AI features such as transcript-based AI Interview Scoring, AI Interview Notes, and AI fraud detection.
§ The record
Intervue.io and VidCruiter are both filed under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Assessment.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Mobley v. Workday and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | Intervue.io | VidCruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | IN | CA |
| Founded | 2020 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Intervue.io 28 · VidCruiter 58
6.0 weighted points to VidCruiter
18% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Intervue.io 12 · VidCruiter 38
4.7 weighted points to VidCruiter
15% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Intervue.io 38 · VidCruiter 56
2.7 weighted points to VidCruiter
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Intervue.io 22 · VidCruiter 32
1.5 weighted points to VidCruiter
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Intervue.io 54 · VidCruiter 62
1.0 weighted points to VidCruiter
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Intervue.io 50 · VidCruiter 60
0.8 weighted points to VidCruiter
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Intervue.io 30 · VidCruiter 33
0.4 weighted points to VidCruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -17.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Intervue.io minus VidCruiter.
| Category | Weight | Intervue.io | VidCruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 58 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 12 | 38 | -26 | -4.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 32 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 62 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 33 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 60 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 31 (F) | 48 (F) | -17 | -17.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Intervue.io | VidCruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 5 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 30 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 12 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Intervue.io has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; VidCruiter has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Intervue.io sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 37 for Intervue.io, across 2 distinct source domains, and 18 for VidCruiter, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Intervue.io last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- VidCruiter last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next