§ The result
JazzHR leads Pulsifi on all 7 criteria.
JazzHR sits 11 points above Pulsifi under rubric v1.0 — 44 against 33 — with JazzHR filed under ATS-integrated and Pulsifi under Assessment. JazzHR is ahead of Pulsifi on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at JazzHR 28 to Pulsifi 25. The advantage JazzHR holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JazzHR 45, Pulsifi 30, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 28% of the weighted points JazzHR gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JazzHR
JazzHR is a small-business applicant tracking system that manages job posting, applications and hiring workflows, and layers on AI "Talent Fit" scoring that ranks candidates against a job description plus automated knockout screening questions.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
§ The record
JazzHR is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Pulsifi under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Pulsifi is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JazzHR | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | SG |
| Founded | 2009 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JazzHR 45 · Pulsifi 30
3.0 weighted points to JazzHR
18% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JazzHR 35 · Pulsifi 20
2.7 weighted points to JazzHR
15% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JazzHR 52 · Pulsifi 40
1.8 weighted points to JazzHR
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JazzHR 42 · Pulsifi 28
1.7 weighted points to JazzHR
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JazzHR 56 · Pulsifi 46
0.8 weighted points to JazzHR
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JazzHR 28 · Pulsifi 25
0.4 weighted points to JazzHR
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JazzHR 58 · Pulsifi 55
0.4 weighted points to JazzHR
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JazzHR minus Pulsifi.
| Category | Weight | JazzHR | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 45 | 30 | +15 | +3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 20 | +15 | +2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 28 | 25 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 58 | 55 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 42 | 28 | +14 | +1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 56 | 46 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 44 (F) | 33 (F) | +11 | +10.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JazzHR | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 17 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JazzHR has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for JazzHR sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 57 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for JazzHR, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JazzHR last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next