§ The result
JobAdder leads Turing on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, JobAdder, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 45 and Turing, filed under Assessment, on 36, 9 points apart. JobAdder takes all 7 criteria from Turing without a 20-point raw gap on any of them; the closest is FRIA Support, JobAdder 30 to Turing 25. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (JobAdder 43, Turing 27, 12% weight), but it accounts for only 21% of the weighted advantage JobAdder holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JobAdder
JobAdder is a Sydney-based ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies and in-house teams whose Adder Intelligence layer, launched in November 2025 on LLMs hosted in Amazon Bedrock, gives every applicant an AI summary and relevancy rating and also drafts client-ready candidate overviews (Smart Floats), suggests skill codes, proposes record updates and writes job ads, alongside database skill matching.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
JobAdder is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Turing under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Turing is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobAdder | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | AU | US |
| Founded | 2007 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 21% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobAdder 43 · Turing 27
1.9 weighted points to JobAdder
15% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobAdder 56 · Turing 44
1.8 weighted points to JobAdder
20% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobAdder 50 · Turing 42
1.6 weighted points to JobAdder
18% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobAdder 35 · Turing 28
1.3 weighted points to JobAdder
12% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobAdder 54 · Turing 45
1.1 weighted points to JobAdder
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobAdder 58 · Turing 48
0.8 weighted points to JobAdder
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobAdder 30 · Turing 25
0.8 weighted points to JobAdder
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobAdder minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | JobAdder | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 42 | +8 | +1.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 28 | +7 | +1.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 44 | +12 | +1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 45 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 43 | 27 | +16 | +1.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 48 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 36 (F) | +9 | +9.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobAdder | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 24 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobAdder has 29 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for JobAdder sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 29 for JobAdder, across 3 distinct source domains, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobAdder last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next