§ The result
Korn Ferry leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Korn Ferry (Assessment) opens a 17-point lead on JobDiva (ATS-integrated), 46 to 29. Of the 7 criteria JobDiva wins none, and the narrowest lead Korn Ferry holds is on FRIA Support, JobDiva 22 to Korn Ferry 25. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (JobDiva 15, Korn Ferry 48) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (JobDiva 28, Korn Ferry 58), the second being 35% of the weighted advantage Korn Ferry holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Korn Ferry
Korn Ferry provides psychometric talent assessments (Korn Ferry Assess, the KF4D Four Dimensional assessment, KFALP leadership-potential assessment, and the Leadership Architect competency framework) used to evaluate candidates' personality, competencies, drivers, and cognitive ability for selection, promotion, and development decisions.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Korn Ferry under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Korn Ferry is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Korn Ferry |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 1969 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Korn Ferry 58
6.0 weighted points to Korn Ferry
18% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Korn Ferry 48
5.9 weighted points to Korn Ferry
15% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Korn Ferry 52
2.1 weighted points to Korn Ferry
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Korn Ferry 52
1.4 weighted points to Korn Ferry
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Korn Ferry 52
0.8 weighted points to Korn Ferry
15% weight · 98% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Korn Ferry 25
0.4 weighted points to Korn Ferry
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Korn Ferry 33
0.4 weighted points to Korn Ferry
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -17 beside that -17.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Korn Ferry.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Korn Ferry | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 58 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 48 | -33 | -5.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 33 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 46 (F) | -17 | -17.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Korn Ferry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Korn Ferry has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Korn Ferry, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Korn Ferry last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next