§ The result
LinkedIn Recruiter leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 28 points between LinkedIn Recruiter (Sourcing) and JobDiva (ATS-integrated): 57 for LinkedIn Recruiter, 29 for JobDiva. LinkedIn Recruiter leads every one of the 7 criteria and 6 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; JobDiva leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (JobDiva 28, LinkedIn Recruiter 67, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 28% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
LinkedIn Recruiter
LinkedIn Recruiter is LinkedIn's enterprise sourcing and candidate-management platform, whose Hiring Assistant add-on and AI-Assisted Search use AI to turn intake notes into qualifications, source and rank candidates, evaluate applicants against recruiter-set qualifications, and draft or send outreach.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only LinkedIn Recruiter is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | LinkedIn Recruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2002 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67
7.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
6.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
15% weight · 64% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62
3.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
12% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66
3.1 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38
2.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50
2.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68
2.1 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -27.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -28 beside that -27.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus LinkedIn Recruiter.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | LinkedIn Recruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 67 | -39 | -7.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 50 | -35 | -6.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 38 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 62 | -24 | -3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 66 | -26 | -3.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 50 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 68 | -26 | -2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 57 (F) | -28 | -27.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | LinkedIn Recruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 34 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 67 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next