§ The result
Maki People leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 38 points between Maki People (Assessment) and JobDiva (ATS-integrated): 67 (D) for Maki People, 29 (F) for JobDiva. Maki People is ahead of JobDiva on all 7 criteria, every one of them by 20 raw points or more. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 15, Maki People 80, 18% weight), is only 31% of the weighted advantage Maki People builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Maki People is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | FR |
| Founded | 2003 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Maki People 80
11.7 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 50% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Maki People 64
7.2 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 66% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Maki People 62
6.0 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Maki People 64
3.9 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Maki People 66
3.1 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Maki People 55
3.0 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Maki People 74
2.6 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -37.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 37.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -38 beside that -37.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 64 | -36 | -7.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 80 | -65 | -11.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 62 | -40 | -6.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 64 | -26 | -3.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 66 | -26 | -3.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 55 | -25 | -3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 74 | -32 | -2.6 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 67 (D) | -38 | -37.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next