§ The result
Mercer | Mettl leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Mercer | Mettl, filed under Assessment, comes out 13 points above JobDiva, filed under ATS-integrated: 42 against 29 under rubric v1.0. Mercer | Mettl leads every one of the 7 criteria, JobDiva none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, JobDiva 40 to Mercer | Mettl 45. The advantage Mercer | Mettl holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 15, Mercer | Mettl 42, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 38% of the weighted points Mercer | Mettl gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Mercer | Mettl
Mercer | Mettl is an online talent assessment and remote-proctoring platform offering psychometric, aptitude, coding, and skills tests plus AI-assisted exam proctoring and scoring for hiring, certification, and L&D.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Mercer | Mettl under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Mercer | Mettl is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Mercer | Mettl |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2003 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 38% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Mercer | Mettl 42
4.9 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
15% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Mercer | Mettl 55
2.5 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Mercer | Mettl 38
2.0 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Mercer | Mettl 38
1.0 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Mercer | Mettl 28
0.9 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Mercer | Mettl 52
0.8 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Mercer | Mettl 45
0.6 weighted points to Mercer | Mettl
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -12.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -13 beside that -12.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Mercer | Mettl.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Mercer | Mettl | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 38 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 42 | -27 | -4.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 45 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 42 (F) | -13 | -12.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Mercer | Mettl | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Mercer | Mettl has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Mercer | Mettl, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Mercer | Mettl last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next