§ The result
PageUp leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, PageUp scores 64 (D) to 29 (F) for JobDiva, a 35-point gap between two ATS-integrated entries. PageUp leads every one of the 7 criteria and 6 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; JobDiva leads none. Even Bias Audit Transparency, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 15, PageUp 80, 18% weight), is only 34% of the weighted advantage PageUp builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
PageUp
PageUp is an enterprise talent acquisition suite (ATS, recruitment marketing/CRM, onboarding, learning and performance). Its AI Skills Matching sorts each applicant's resume against skills taken from the job ad into five bands, from Excellent Match to Not a Match, and recruiters reach those results through Paige, its conversational assistant.
§ The record
JobDiva and PageUp are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only PageUp is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | PageUp |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2003 | 1997 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · PageUp 80
11.7 weighted points to PageUp
20% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · PageUp 74
9.2 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 71% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · PageUp 63
3.8 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · PageUp 55
3.0 weighted points to PageUp
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · PageUp 64
2.9 weighted points to PageUp
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · PageUp 40
2.7 weighted points to PageUp
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · PageUp 63
1.7 weighted points to PageUp
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -34.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 34.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -35 beside that -34.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus PageUp.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | PageUp | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 74 | -46 | -9.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 80 | -65 | -11.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 40 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 63 | -25 | -3.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 64 | -24 | -2.9 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 55 | -25 | -3.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 63 | -21 | -1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 64 (D) | -35 | -34.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | PageUp | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; PageUp has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for PageUp sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 28 for PageUp, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- PageUp last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next