§ The result
Plum leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between Plum (Assessment) and JobDiva (ATS-integrated): 54 for Plum, 29 for JobDiva. Plum leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; JobDiva leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (JobDiva 15, Plum 83) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 48% of the weighted advantage Plum holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Plum
Plum is a pre-employment talent assessment platform that uses a Five-Factor (Big Five) psychometric Discovery Survey and a Talent Match model to score and rank candidates on behavioral "durable skills" for role fit, hiring, and development.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Plum under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Plum is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Plum |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | CA |
| Founded | 2003 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Plum 83
12.2 weighted points to Plum
20% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Plum 58
6.0 weighted points to Plum
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Plum 54
2.4 weighted points to Plum
8% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Plum 63
1.7 weighted points to Plum
12% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Plum 52
1.4 weighted points to Plum
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Plum 28
0.9 weighted points to Plum
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Plum 36
0.7 weighted points to Plum
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -25.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -25.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Plum.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Plum | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 58 | -30 | -6.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 83 | -68 | -12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 28 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 54 | -16 | -2.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 36 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 63 | -21 | -1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 54 (F) | -25 | -25.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Plum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 15 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Plum has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Plum, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Plum last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next