§ The result
The Predictive Index leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
The Predictive Index finishes 19 points clear of JobDiva under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 29 — across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. The Predictive Index leads every one of the 7 criteria, JobDiva none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Human Oversight Design, JobDiva 40 to The Predictive Index 52. The advantage The Predictive Index holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 15, The Predictive Index 45, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 29% of the weighted points The Predictive Index gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
The Predictive Index
The Predictive Index provides validated behavioral and cognitive psychometric assessments used to screen, hire, and develop employees and design teams, alongside AI-assisted talent-management software.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, The Predictive Index under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only The Predictive Index is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | The Predictive Index |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 1955 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 29% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · The Predictive Index 45
5.4 weighted points to The Predictive Index
20% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · The Predictive Index 50
4.4 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 66% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · The Predictive Index 55
2.5 weighted points to The Predictive Index
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · The Predictive Index 35
1.9 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · The Predictive Index 43
1.6 weighted points to The Predictive Index
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · The Predictive Index 52
1.4 weighted points to The Predictive Index
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · The Predictive Index 60
1.4 weighted points to The Predictive Index
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -19 beside that -18.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus The Predictive Index.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | The Predictive Index | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 50 | -22 | -4.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 45 | -30 | -5.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 43 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 60 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 48 (F) | -19 | -18.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | The Predictive Index | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 18 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; The Predictive Index has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 24 for The Predictive Index, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- The Predictive Index last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next