§ The result
Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 27 points between Pymetrics (Harver Games) (Assessment) and JobDiva (ATS-integrated): 56 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), 29 for JobDiva. Pymetrics (Harver Games) leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; JobDiva leads none. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (JobDiva 15, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Behavioral assessment using browser-based "games" that infer cognitive and emotional traits. Acquired by Harver in 2022 and folded into the Harver Games product line.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Pymetrics (Harver Games) under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Pymetrics (Harver Games) |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 44% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80
11.7 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
20% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70
8.4 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60
3.3 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50
1.2 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55
1.0 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
12% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35
0.6 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25
0.4 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -26.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -27 beside that -26.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Pymetrics (Harver Games).
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 70 | -42 | -8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 80 | -65 | -11.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 50 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 56 (F) | -27 | -26.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Pymetrics (Harver Games) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.