§ The result
Sapia.ai leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Sapia.ai (Assessment) and JobDiva (ATS-integrated) are 27 points apart under rubric v1.0, 56 for Sapia.ai against 29 for JobDiva. JobDiva leads none of the 7 criteria, and Sapia.ai is ahead on 6 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 28, Sapia.ai 70, 20% weight), is only 31% of the weighted advantage Sapia.ai builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Sapia.ai
Structured, text-based chat interview that scores candidates on personality (HEXACO) and competency traits - with no video, audio, or demographic data used.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Sapia.ai under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Sapia.ai is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Sapia.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | AU |
| Founded | 2003 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Sapia.ai 70
8.4 weighted points to Sapia.ai
18% weight · 55% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Sapia.ai 52
6.7 weighted points to Sapia.ai
15% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Sapia.ai 62
3.6 weighted points to Sapia.ai
12% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Sapia.ai 62
2.6 weighted points to Sapia.ai
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Sapia.ai 50
2.4 weighted points to Sapia.ai
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Sapia.ai 35
1.9 weighted points to Sapia.ai
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Sapia.ai 62
1.6 weighted points to Sapia.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -27.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -27 beside that -27.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Sapia.ai.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Sapia.ai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 70 | -42 | -8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 52 | -37 | -6.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 62 | -24 | -3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 62 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 50 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 62 | -20 | -1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 56 (F) | -27 | -27.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Sapia.ai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Sapia.ai has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Sapia.ai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 20 for Sapia.ai, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sapia.ai last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next