§ The result
SmartRecruiters leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, SmartRecruiters scores 62 (D) to 29 (F) for JobDiva, a 33-point gap between two ATS-integrated entries. JobDiva leads none of the 7 criteria, and SmartRecruiters is ahead on 6 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. The advantage SmartRecruiters holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 15, SmartRecruiters 78, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 34% of the weighted points SmartRecruiters gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
SmartRecruiters
SmartRecruiters is an enterprise applicant tracking system and talent acquisition suite whose AI layer (the Winston assistant plus SmartAssistant/Winston Match) screens, ranks, and matches candidates to requisitions to support recruiter decisions.
§ The record
JobDiva and SmartRecruiters are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only SmartRecruiters is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | SmartRecruiters |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 34% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · SmartRecruiters 78
11.3 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
20% weight · 59% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · SmartRecruiters 70
8.4 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
15% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · SmartRecruiters 62
3.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
15% weight · 81% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · SmartRecruiters 45
3.4 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · SmartRecruiters 62
2.6 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · SmartRecruiters 48
2.2 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · SmartRecruiters 63
1.7 weighted points to SmartRecruiters
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -33.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 33.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -33 beside that -33.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus SmartRecruiters.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | SmartRecruiters | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 70 | -42 | -8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 78 | -63 | -11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 45 | -23 | -3.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 62 | -24 | -3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 62 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 48 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 63 | -21 | -1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 62 (D) | -33 | -33.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | SmartRecruiters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; SmartRecruiters has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SmartRecruiters sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 13 for SmartRecruiters, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- SmartRecruiters last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next