§ The result
TestGorilla leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
TestGorilla finishes 18 points clear of JobDiva under rubric v1.0 — 47 against 29 — across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. TestGorilla leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; JobDiva leads none. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 28, TestGorilla 52, 20% weight), is only 27% of the weighted advantage TestGorilla builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
TestGorilla
TestGorilla is a pre-employment skills-assessment platform offering a large test library plus AI features for resume scoring, candidate sourcing, and one-way/conversational AI video interviews to support skills-based hiring.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, TestGorilla under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only TestGorilla is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | TestGorilla |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | NL |
| Founded | 2003 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · TestGorilla 52
4.8 weighted points to TestGorilla
18% weight · 51% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · TestGorilla 38
4.1 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · TestGorilla 56
2.7 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · TestGorilla 60
2.4 weighted points to TestGorilla
8% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · TestGorilla 58
1.3 weighted points to TestGorilla
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · TestGorilla 30
1.2 weighted points to TestGorilla
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · TestGorilla 38
1.0 weighted points to TestGorilla
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus TestGorilla.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | TestGorilla | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 52 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 38 | -23 | -4.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 60 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 47 (F) | -18 | -17.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | TestGorilla | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 14 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; TestGorilla has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for TestGorilla sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for TestGorilla, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- TestGorilla last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next