§ The result
Toggl Hire leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Toggl Hire scores 37 and JobDiva 29 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Toggl Hire is ahead of JobDiva on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Article 11 Technical Documentation at JobDiva 28 to Toggl Hire 30. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (JobDiva 38, Toggl Hire 55, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Toggl Hire holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Toggl Hire
Toggl Hire is a skills-first hiring platform (now being retired) that screens candidates with auto-graded skills tests, async video interviews and homework assignments, bundled with a lightweight ATS.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Toggl Hire under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Toggl Hire is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Toggl Hire |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | EE |
| Founded | 2003 | 2013 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 33% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Toggl Hire 55
2.5 weighted points to Toggl Hire
12% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Toggl Hire 52
1.4 weighted points to Toggl Hire
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Toggl Hire 30
1.2 weighted points to Toggl Hire
18% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Toggl Hire 20
0.9 weighted points to Toggl Hire
8% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Toggl Hire 50
0.6 weighted points to Toggl Hire
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Toggl Hire 35
0.6 weighted points to Toggl Hire
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Toggl Hire 30
0.4 weighted points to Toggl Hire
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -7.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -7.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Toggl Hire.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Toggl Hire | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 30 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 20 | -5 | -0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 50 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 37 (F) | -8 | -7.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Toggl Hire | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Toggl Hire has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 4 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Toggl Hire, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Toggl Hire last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next