§ The result
Tribepad leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Tribepad scores 56 to 29 for JobDiva, a 27-point gap between two ATS-integrated entries. JobDiva leads none of the 7 criteria, and Tribepad is ahead on 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — JobDiva 15, Tribepad 78 — and at an 18% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Tribepad holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Tribepad
Tribepad is a UK applicant tracking system whose built-in Sidekick AI assistant scores and ranks applicants against recruiter-weighted skills and generates candidate summaries, SWOT analyses, job descriptions, salary suggestions and interview questions.
§ The record
JobDiva and Tribepad are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Tribepad is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | Tribepad |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | GB |
| Founded | 2003 | 2008 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Tribepad 78
11.3 weighted points to Tribepad
20% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Tribepad 56
5.6 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Tribepad 54
2.9 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Tribepad 56
2.7 weighted points to Tribepad
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Tribepad 58
2.2 weighted points to Tribepad
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Tribepad 58
1.3 weighted points to Tribepad
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Tribepad 30
1.2 weighted points to Tribepad
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -27.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -27 beside that -27.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Tribepad.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Tribepad | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 56 | -28 | -5.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 78 | -63 | -11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 54 | -24 | -2.9 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 58 | -16 | -1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 56 (F) | -27 | -27.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Tribepad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Tribepad has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tribepad sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 32 for Tribepad, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tribepad last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next