§ The result
Turing leads JobDiva by 7 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Turing, filed under Assessment, finishes on 36 and JobDiva, filed under ATS-integrated, on 29, 7 points apart. JobDiva takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Post-Market Monitoring among them, against 6 for Turing, whose share includes Article 11 Technical Documentation. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 28, Turing 42, 20% weight), is only 37% of the weighted advantage Turing builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Turing under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Turing is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Turing |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2018 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Turing 42
2.8 weighted points to Turing
18% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Turing 28
2.3 weighted points to Turing
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Turing 44
0.9 weighted points to Turing
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Turing 45
0.6 weighted points to Turing
8% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Turing 48
0.5 weighted points to Turing
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Turing 25
0.4 weighted points to Turing
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Turing 27
0.4 weighted points to JobDiva
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -7.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -7.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Turing | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 42 | -14 | -2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 28 | -13 | -2.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 44 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 45 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 27 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 48 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 36 (F) | -7 | -7.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Turing | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 8 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Turing has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 8 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 14 for Turing, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Turing last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next