§ The result
Wonderlic leads JobDiva on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Wonderlic, filed under Assessment, comes out 14 points above JobDiva, filed under ATS-integrated: 43 against 29 under rubric v1.0. JobDiva is ahead on none of the 7 criteria: Wonderlic takes 6, the remaining criterion is level, and the nearest of those 6 is FRIA Support, JobDiva 22 to Wonderlic 25. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — JobDiva 15, Wonderlic 48 — and at an 18% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Wonderlic holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Wonderlic
Wonderlic Select (formerly WonScore) is a pre-employment assessment that combines cognitive ability, personality, and motivation tests to score and rank candidates for job fit.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Wonderlic under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Wonderlic is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Wonderlic |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 1937 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Wonderlic 48
5.9 weighted points to Wonderlic
20% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Wonderlic 52
4.8 weighted points to Wonderlic
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Wonderlic 52
1.4 weighted points to Wonderlic
8% weight · 94% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Wonderlic 55
1.0 weighted points to Wonderlic
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Wonderlic 25
0.4 weighted points to Wonderlic
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Wonderlic 33
0.4 weighted points to Wonderlic
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -14.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 14.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -14 beside that -14.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Wonderlic.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Wonderlic | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 52 | -24 | -4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 48 | -33 | -5.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 25 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 38 | - | - |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 33 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 55 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 43 (F) | -14 | -14.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Wonderlic | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Wonderlic has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 15 for Wonderlic, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Wonderlic last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next