§ The result
Workday Recruiting AI leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Workday Recruiting AI scores 56 to 29 for JobDiva, a 27-point gap between two ATS-integrated entries. JobDiva leads none of the 7 criteria, and Workday Recruiting AI is ahead on 4 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Bias Audit Transparency (JobDiva 15, Workday Recruiting AI 60) and Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (JobDiva 28, Workday Recruiting AI 70), the second being 32% of the weighted advantage Workday Recruiting AI holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Workday Recruiting AI
AI features built into Workday Recruiting, including candidate-skill matching and recruiter productivity tools, surfaced inside the Workday ATS.
§ The record
JobDiva and Workday Recruiting AI are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act.
| Record | JobDiva | Workday Recruiting AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Workday Recruiting AI 70
8.4 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
18% weight · 62% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Workday Recruiting AI 60
8.1 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
3.0 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Workday Recruiting AI 55
2.5 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
1.9 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Workday Recruiting AI 65
1.8 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Workday Recruiting AI 35
0.6 weighted points to Workday Recruiting AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -26.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 26.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -27 beside that -26.4.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Workday Recruiting AI.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Workday Recruiting AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 70 | -42 | -8.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 60 | -45 | -8.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 65 | -25 | -3.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 65 | -23 | -1.8 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 56 (F) | -27 | -26.4 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Workday Recruiting AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 9 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Workday Recruiting AI has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Workday Recruiting AI, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workday Recruiting AI last reviewed
- May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next