§ The result
Xobin leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
Xobin finishes 21 points clear of JobDiva under rubric v1.0 — 50 against 29 — across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. Of the 7 criteria JobDiva wins none, and the narrowest lead Xobin holds is on Post-Market Monitoring, JobDiva 30 to Xobin 38. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (JobDiva 28, Xobin 62, 20% weight), is only 32% of the weighted advantage Xobin builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
Xobin
Xobin is a talent-assessment platform that sells skills, coding, communication and psychometric tests alongside generative-AI answer scoring (AI Evaluate), AI-led interviews, AI proctoring and NURA, an AI recruiting agent that parses resumes, interviews candidates and builds shortlists.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Xobin under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only Xobin is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | JobDiva | Xobin |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Low |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2003 | 2016 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · Xobin 62
6.8 weighted points to Xobin
18% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · Xobin 43
5.0 weighted points to Xobin
15% weight · 69% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · Xobin 57
2.9 weighted points to Xobin
12% weight · 79% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · Xobin 58
2.2 weighted points to Xobin
15% weight · 89% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · Xobin 35
1.9 weighted points to Xobin
8% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · Xobin 60
1.4 weighted points to Xobin
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · Xobin 38
1.0 weighted points to Xobin
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -21.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus Xobin.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | Xobin | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 62 | -34 | -6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 43 | -28 | -5.0 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 35 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 57 | -19 | -2.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 58 | -18 | -2.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 38 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 60 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 50 (F) | -21 | -21.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | Xobin | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 27 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; Xobin has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Xobin sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 60 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 32 for Xobin, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Xobin last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next