§ The result
ZipRecruiter leads JobDiva on all 7 criteria.
ZipRecruiter sits 11 points above JobDiva under rubric v1.0 — 40 against 29 — with ZipRecruiter filed under Sourcing and JobDiva under ATS-integrated. ZipRecruiter is ahead of JobDiva on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being FRIA Support at JobDiva 22 to ZipRecruiter 27. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap (JobDiva 40, ZipRecruiter 55) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (JobDiva 28, ZipRecruiter 40), 22% of the weighted advantage ZipRecruiter builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
JobDiva
JobDiva is an all-in-one ATS, CRM, onboarding, back-office and VMS-synchronization platform for staffing agencies, with AI features including DivaMatch candidate-to-job scoring, AI-enhanced matching and semantic search, resume harvesting and generative outreach.
Vendor profile
ZipRecruiter
ZipRecruiter is an online employment marketplace whose AI matching engine sends employers' job postings out, alerts matched job seekers and invites them to apply, and labels and ranks applicants (for example as 'Great Match') in the employer's candidate dashboard.
§ The record
JobDiva is filed under ATS-integrated AI, ZipRecruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Colorado AI Act. Only ZipRecruiter is in scope of Illinois HB 3773.
| Record | JobDiva | ZipRecruiter |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2003 | 2010 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 22% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
JobDiva 28 · ZipRecruiter 40
2.4 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
15% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
JobDiva 38 · ZipRecruiter 52
2.1 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
12% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
JobDiva 40 · ZipRecruiter 55
1.8 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
18% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
JobDiva 15 · ZipRecruiter 24
1.6 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
JobDiva 30 · ZipRecruiter 40
1.2 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
JobDiva 42 · ZipRecruiter 54
1.0 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
JobDiva 22 · ZipRecruiter 27
0.8 weighted points to ZipRecruiter
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -10.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is JobDiva minus ZipRecruiter.
| Category | Weight | JobDiva | ZipRecruiter | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 15 | 24 | -9 | -1.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 22 | 27 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 40 | 55 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 42 | 54 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 29 (F) | 40 (F) | -11 | -10.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | JobDiva | ZipRecruiter | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 2 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
JobDiva has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; ZipRecruiter has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for ZipRecruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for JobDiva, across 2 distinct source domains, and 33 for ZipRecruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- JobDiva last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- ZipRecruiter last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next