HomeCompareJobma vs Recruitly

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Jobma vs Recruitly

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Jobma leads Recruitly by 8 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Jobma, filed under Video interview, finishes on 49 and Recruitly, filed under ATS-integrated, on 41, 8 points apart. Jobma leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Recruitly leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Jobma 40, Recruitly 15 — and at an 18% weight it carries 53% of the weighted advantage Jobma holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Jobma is filed under Video interview AI, Recruitly under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Jobma is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordJobmaRecruitly
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSAE
Founded20122015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 52% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Jobma 40 · Recruitly 15

    4.5 weighted points to Jobma

  2. 20% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Jobma 55 · Recruitly 45

    2.0 weighted points to Jobma

  3. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Jobma 56 · Recruitly 45

    1.6 weighted points to Jobma

  4. 8% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Jobma 62 · Recruitly 58

    0.3 weighted points to Jobma

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Jobma 44 · Recruitly 45

    0.1 weighted points to Recruitly

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +8.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +8 beside that +8.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Jobma minus Recruitly.

CategoryWeightJobmaRecruitlyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5545+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4015+25+4.5
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5645+11+1.6
Human Oversight Design12%6060--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4445-1-0.1
Customer Documentation8%6258+4+0.3
Total100%49 (F)41 (F)+8+8.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJobmaRecruitly
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%174Sources on the vendor's own domain325Sources on the vendor's own domain

Jobma has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 21 for Jobma, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Jobma last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitly last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.