§ The result
LandEarly leads Jobright.ai by 16 points.
LandEarly finishes 16 points clear of Jobright.ai under rubric js-v1.0 — 62 (D) against 46 (F) — across the Auto-apply and Job matching cohorts. LandEarly leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Application Honesty, while Jobright.ai leads 1, including Support & Accountability. Application Honesty is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Jobright.ai 35, LandEarly 68, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 38% of the weighted advantage LandEarly holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Jobright.ai
Jobright.ai is an AI job-search copilot for job seekers that matches candidates to listings, tailors resumes and cover letters, surfaces insider referrals, and offers an auto-apply agent (Orion) that fills and submits applications across supported job boards.
Vendor profile
LandEarly
LandEarly is an AI auto-apply platform that monitors job boards, generates role-tailored resumes and cover letters from a job seeker's real history, and submits applications through supported applicant tracking systems, with a review-before-submit step and an optional autopilot mode.
§ The record
Jobright.ai is filed under AI job matching, LandEarly under Auto-apply tools. They also share 2 secondary categories: Auto-apply and Resume AI.
| Record | Jobright.ai | LandEarly |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2021 | 2026 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 35% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Jobright.ai 35 · LandEarly 68
6.6 weighted points to LandEarly
15% weight · 49% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Jobright.ai 55 · LandEarly 72
2.5 weighted points to LandEarly
20% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Jobright.ai 54 · LandEarly 66
2.4 weighted points to LandEarly
10% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Jobright.ai 40 · LandEarly 63
2.3 weighted points to LandEarly
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Jobright.ai 45 · LandEarly 60
2.3 weighted points to LandEarly
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Jobright.ai 38 · LandEarly 50
1.4 weighted points to LandEarly
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Jobright.ai 60 · LandEarly 44
1.3 weighted points to Jobright.ai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -16.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -16 beside that -16.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Jobright.ai minus LandEarly.
| Category | Weight | Jobright.ai | LandEarly | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 35 | 68 | -33 | -6.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 54 | 66 | -12 | -2.4 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 55 | 72 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 38 | 50 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 40 | 63 | -23 | -2.3 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 60 | 44 | +16 | +1.3 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 62 (D) | -16 | -16.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Jobright.ai | LandEarly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 2 | 0 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 4 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 10 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Jobright.ai has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; LandEarly has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Jobright.ai, across 6 distinct source domains, and 16 for LandEarly, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Jobright.ai last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- LandEarly last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next