HomeCompareJobvite vs Talview

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Jobvite vs Talview

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Jobvite leads Talview on 4 of the 7 criteria.

Jobvite (ATS-integrated) edges Talview (Video interview) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 45 to 42. Jobvite leads 4 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 3 are level, so Talview is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 4 Jobvite leads is FRIA Support, Jobvite 30 to Talview 25. Data Governance Disclosure is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Jobvite 55, Talview 48, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 35% of the weighted advantage Jobvite holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Jobvite is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Talview under Video interview AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Talview is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordJobviteTalview
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20062012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Jobvite 55 · Talview 48

    1.1 weighted points to Jobvite

  2. 15% weight · 60% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Jobvite 30 · Talview 25

    0.8 weighted points to Jobvite

  3. 12% weight · 84% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Jobvite 38 · Talview 32

    0.7 weighted points to Jobvite

  4. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Jobvite 58 · Talview 52

    0.5 weighted points to Jobvite

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to +3.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Jobvite minus Talview.

CategoryWeightJobviteTalviewΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5050--
Bias Audit Transparency18%3838--
FRIA Support15%3025+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5548+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5555--
Post-Market Monitoring12%3832+6+0.7
Customer Documentation8%5852+6+0.5
Total100%45 (F)42 (F)+3+3.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJobviteTalview
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%30Sources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11
FRIA Support15%1201
Data Governance Disclosure15%21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%2020Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%30Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%155Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain116Sources on the vendor's own domain

Jobvite has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Talview has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jobvite sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 36 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Jobvite, across 3 distinct source domains, and 17 for Talview, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Jobvite last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Talview last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.