HomeCompareJuicebox (PeopleGPT) vs Keka

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) vs Keka

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads Keka on 6 of the 7 criteria.

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) finishes 20 points clear of Keka under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 37 — across the Sourcing and ATS-integrated cohorts. Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Keka is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads is FRIA Support, Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 35 to Keka 30. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84, Keka 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 58% of the weighted advantage Juicebox (PeopleGPT) holds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Keka under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordJuicebox (PeopleGPT)Keka
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSIN
Founded20222014

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 58% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84 · Keka 20

    11.5 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  2. 20% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 52 · Keka 30

    4.4 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  3. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 55 · Keka 40

    1.8 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  4. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 56 · Keka 50

    0.9 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  5. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 35 · Keka 30

    0.8 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 60 · Keka 55

    0.4 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +19.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 19.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +20 beside that +19.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Juicebox (PeopleGPT) minus Keka.

CategoryWeightJuicebox (PeopleGPT)KekaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5230+22+4.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%8420+64+11.5
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5650+6+0.9
Human Oversight Design12%5050--
Post-Market Monitoring12%5540+15+1.8
Customer Documentation8%6055+5+0.4
Total100%57 (F)37 (F)+20+19.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightJuicebox (PeopleGPT)Keka
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%30Audit reportSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on a separate domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%20Audit reportSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%124Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain287Sources on the vendor's own domain

Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Juicebox (PeopleGPT) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains, and 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Keka last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.