§ The result
3 points separate Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and Plum.
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) (Sourcing) edges Plum (Assessment) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 57 to 54. Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Post-Market Monitoring, while Plum leads 3, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. Post-Market Monitoring is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 55, Plum 36 — and at a 12% weight it carries 60% of the weighted advantage Juicebox (PeopleGPT) holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
Vendor profile
Plum
Plum is a pre-employment talent assessment platform that uses a Five-Factor (Big Five) psychometric Discovery Survey and a Talent Match model to score and rank candidates on behavioral "durable skills" for role fit, hiring, and development.
§ The record
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Plum under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Plum is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Plum |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | CA |
| Founded | 2022 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 55 · Plum 36
2.3 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
20% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 52 · Plum 58
1.2 weighted points to Plum
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 35 · Plum 28
1.1 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
15% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 56 · Plum 54
0.3 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 50 · Plum 52
0.2 weighted points to Plum
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 60 · Plum 63
0.2 weighted points to Plum
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84 · Plum 83
0.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +2.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +2.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Juicebox (PeopleGPT) minus Plum.
| Category | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Plum | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 58 | -6 | -1.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 83 | +1 | +0.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 28 | +7 | +1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 54 | +2 | +0.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 52 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 36 | +19 | +2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 63 | -3 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 54 (F) | +3 | +2.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Plum | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 0 | 1 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 15 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Plum has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Juicebox (PeopleGPT) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 35 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains, and 19 for Plum, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Plum last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next