§ The result
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) leads Prevue HR by 13 points.
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) sits 13 points above Prevue HR under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 44 — with Juicebox (PeopleGPT) filed under Sourcing and Prevue HR under Assessment. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Juicebox (PeopleGPT): Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Prevue HR on Human Oversight Design. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84, Prevue HR 44) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 56% of the weighted advantage Juicebox (PeopleGPT) holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is an AI talent-sourcing search engine that lets recruiters find, rank, and reach candidates across 800M+ public profiles using natural-language queries instead of Boolean search, with an "Autopilot" agent that scores and ranks profiles against job criteria.
Vendor profile
Prevue HR
Prevue HR's psychometric platform tests candidates' aptitude, personality and motivations and compares the results with a custom role benchmark to produce a percentage Job Suitability score and Job-Fit report, alongside an optional applicant tracking system (APS Pro).
§ The record
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Prevue HR under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: ATS-integrated.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Prevue HR is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Prevue HR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | CA |
| Founded | 2022 | 1994 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 84 · Prevue HR 44
7.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
12% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 55 · Prevue HR 40
1.8 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
20% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 52 · Prevue HR 45
1.4 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
15% weight · 86% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 35 · Prevue HR 27
1.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 56 · Prevue HR 48
1.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 50 · Prevue HR 54
0.5 weighted points to Prevue HR
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) 60 · Prevue HR 58
0.2 weighted points to Juicebox (PeopleGPT)
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +12.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Juicebox (PeopleGPT) minus Prevue HR.
| Category | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Prevue HR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 45 | +7 | +1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 84 | 44 | +40 | +7.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 27 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 56 | 48 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 54 | -4 | -0.5 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 40 | +15 | +1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 60 | 58 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 44 (F) | +13 | +12.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Juicebox (PeopleGPT) | Prevue HR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Juicebox (PeopleGPT) has 16 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Prevue HR has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Juicebox (PeopleGPT) and Prevue HR sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 16 for Juicebox (PeopleGPT), across 4 distinct source domains, and 34 for Prevue HR, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Juicebox (PeopleGPT) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Prevue HR last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next