HomeCompareKeka vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Keka vs LinkedIn Recruiter

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Keka on all 7 criteria.

Under rubric v1.0, LinkedIn Recruiter (Sourcing) opens a 20-point lead on Keka (ATS-integrated), 57 to 37. LinkedIn Recruiter takes all 7 criteria and Keka none of them; the nearest contest is FRIA Support, Keka 30 to LinkedIn Recruiter 38. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Keka 30, LinkedIn Recruiter 67, 20% weight), is only 37% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Keka is filed under ATS-integrated AI, LinkedIn Recruiter under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordKekaLinkedIn Recruiter
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersINUS
Founded20142002

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Keka 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 67

    7.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 18% weight · 64% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Keka 20 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    5.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 12% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Keka 50 · LinkedIn Recruiter 66

    1.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 15% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Keka 50 · LinkedIn Recruiter 62

    1.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Keka 30 · LinkedIn Recruiter 38

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Keka 40 · LinkedIn Recruiter 50

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Keka 55 · LinkedIn Recruiter 68

    1.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -20 beside that -20.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Keka minus LinkedIn Recruiter.

CategoryWeightKekaLinkedIn RecruiterΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3067-37-7.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%2050-30-5.4
FRIA Support15%3038-8-1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%5062-12-1.8
Human Oversight Design12%5066-16-1.9
Post-Market Monitoring12%4050-10-1.2
Customer Documentation8%5568-13-1.0
Total100%37 (F)57 (F)-20-20.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightKekaLinkedIn Recruiter
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%71Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%287Sources on the vendor's own domain345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 74 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain, and 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Keka last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.