HomeCompareKeka vs Pin

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Keka vs Pin

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Pin leads Keka on 2 of the 7 criteria.

Pin (Sourcing) edges Keka (ATS-integrated) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 40 to 37. Pin leads 2 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 5 are level, so Keka is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 2 Pin leads is Post-Market Monitoring, Keka 40 to Pin 45. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Keka 20, Pin 35) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 82% of the weighted advantage Pin holds across the 2 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Keka is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Pin under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordKekaPin
Price tierLowLow
HeadquartersINUS
Founded20142024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Keka 20 · Pin 35

    2.7 weighted points to Pin

  2. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Keka 40 · Pin 45

    0.6 weighted points to Pin

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 2 figures above sum to -3.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Keka minus Pin.

CategoryWeightKekaPinΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3030--
Bias Audit Transparency18%2035-15-2.7
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5050--
Human Oversight Design12%5050--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4045-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%5555--
Total100%37 (F)40 (F)-3-3.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightKekaPin
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%71Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%287Sources on the vendor's own domain325Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pin has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Pin, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Keka last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pin last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.