HomeCompareKeka vs Saville Assessment

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Keka vs Saville Assessment

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Saville Assessment leads Keka by 11 points.

Saville Assessment sits 11 points above Keka under rubric v1.0 — 48 against 37 — with Saville Assessment filed under Assessment and Keka under ATS-integrated. Saville Assessment leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Keka leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring. Bias Audit Transparency is the widest raw gap (Keka 20, Saville Assessment 42) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (Keka 30, Saville Assessment 50), 36% of the weighted advantage Saville Assessment builds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Keka is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Saville Assessment under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Saville Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordKekaSaville Assessment
Price tierLowEnterprise
HeadquartersINGB
Founded20142004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Keka 30 · Saville Assessment 50

    4.0 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  2. 18% weight · 70% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Keka 20 · Saville Assessment 42

    4.0 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  3. 15% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Keka 30 · Saville Assessment 40

    1.5 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  4. 15% weight · 89% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Keka 50 · Saville Assessment 55

    0.8 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Keka 50 · Saville Assessment 55

    0.6 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Keka 55 · Saville Assessment 60

    0.4 weighted points to Saville Assessment

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Keka 40 · Saville Assessment 38

    0.2 weighted points to Keka

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -11.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -11.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Keka minus Saville Assessment.

CategoryWeightKekaSaville AssessmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3050-20-4.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2042-22-4.0
FRIA Support15%3040-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%5055-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%5055-5-0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4038+2+0.2
Customer Documentation8%5560-5-0.4
Total100%37 (F)48 (F)-11-11.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightKekaSaville Assessment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%71Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%287Sources on the vendor's own domain346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 75 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Keka last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.