HomeCompareKnockri vs softgarden

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Knockri vs softgarden

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Knockri leads softgarden by 5 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Knockri, filed under Video interview, finishes on 47 and softgarden, filed under ATS-integrated, on 42, 5 points apart. Knockri leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while softgarden leads 2, including Post-Market Monitoring. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Knockri 55, softgarden 42 — and at a 20% weight it carries 43% of the weighted advantage Knockri holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Knockri is filed under Video interview AI, softgarden under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Knockri is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordKnockrisoftgarden
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersCADE
Founded20172001

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Knockri 55 · softgarden 42

    2.6 weighted points to Knockri

  2. 18% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Knockri 35 · softgarden 22

    2.3 weighted points to Knockri

  3. 12% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Knockri 35 · softgarden 44

    1.1 weighted points to softgarden

  4. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Knockri 35 · softgarden 30

    0.8 weighted points to Knockri

  5. 12% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Knockri 60 · softgarden 58

    0.2 weighted points to Knockri

  6. 8% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Knockri 55 · softgarden 58

    0.2 weighted points to softgarden

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Knockri 55 · softgarden 54

    0.1 weighted points to Knockri

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +5 beside that +4.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Knockri minus softgarden.

CategoryWeightKnockrisoftgardenΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5542+13+2.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%3522+13+2.3
FRIA Support15%3530+5+0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5554+1+0.1
Human Oversight Design12%6058+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%3544-9-1.1
Customer Documentation8%5558-3-0.2
Total100%47 (F)42 (F)+5+4.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightKnockrisoftgarden
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain70Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%71Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%365Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain315Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Knockri has 41 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 36 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; softgarden has 36 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Knockri sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 77 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 41 for Knockri, across 7 distinct source domains, and 36 for softgarden, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Knockri last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
softgarden last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.