HomeCompareLinkedIn Recruiter vs micro1

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

LinkedIn Recruiter vs micro1

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads micro1 on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter finishes 21 points clear of micro1 under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 36 — across the Sourcing and Screening cohorts. LinkedIn Recruiter leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them; micro1 leads none. The advantage LinkedIn Recruiter holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (LinkedIn Recruiter 50, micro1 20, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 26% of the weighted points LinkedIn Recruiter gains across the 7 criteria it leads.

§ The record

LinkedIn Recruiter is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, micro1 under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only micro1 is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordLinkedIn Recruitermicro1
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20022022

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 26% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · micro1 20

    5.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 20% weight · 42% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 67 · micro1 50

    3.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 12% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · micro1 25

    3.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 15% weight · 69% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    LinkedIn Recruiter 62 · micro1 45

    2.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    LinkedIn Recruiter 38 · micro1 22

    2.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    LinkedIn Recruiter 66 · micro1 48

    2.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 68 · micro1 45

    1.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +20.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +21 beside that +20.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is LinkedIn Recruiter minus micro1.

CategoryWeightLinkedIn Recruitermicro1Δ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6750+17+3.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5020+30+5.4
FRIA Support15%3822+16+2.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%6245+17+2.5
Human Oversight Design12%6648+18+2.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%5025+25+3.0
Customer Documentation8%6845+23+1.8
Total100%57 (F)36 (F)+21+20.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLinkedIn Recruitermicro1
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain12Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain70Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain22Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain258Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; micro1 has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter and micro1 sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains, and 33 for micro1, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
micro1 last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.