HomeCompareLinkedIn Recruiter vs Pymetrics (Harver Games)

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

LinkedIn Recruiter vs Pymetrics (Harver Games)

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

1 point separates LinkedIn Recruiter and Pymetrics (Harver Games).

LinkedIn Recruiter holds a 1-point edge over Pymetrics (Harver Games) under rubric v1.0, 57 to 56, across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of LinkedIn Recruiter: LinkedIn Recruiter is ahead on FRIA Support and Pymetrics (Harver Games) on Bias Audit Transparency. Bias Audit Transparency is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Pymetrics (Harver Games) — LinkedIn Recruiter 50, Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80, on an 18% weight — which is 90% of the weighted advantage Pymetrics (Harver Games) holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

LinkedIn Recruiter is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Pymetrics (Harver Games) under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Pymetrics (Harver Games) is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordLinkedIn RecruiterPymetrics (Harver Games)
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20022013

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 42% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 80

    5.4 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  2. 15% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    LinkedIn Recruiter 38 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 25

    1.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 12% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    LinkedIn Recruiter 66 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 50

    1.9 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 35

    1.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 8% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 68 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 55

    1.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 20% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 67 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 70

    0.6 weighted points to Pymetrics (Harver Games)

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    LinkedIn Recruiter 62 · Pymetrics (Harver Games) 60

    0.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +1.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is LinkedIn Recruiter minus Pymetrics (Harver Games).

CategoryWeightLinkedIn RecruiterPymetrics (Harver Games)Δ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6770-3-0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%5080-30-5.4
FRIA Support15%3825+13+1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6260+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6650+16+1.9
Post-Market Monitoring12%5035+15+1.8
Customer Documentation8%6855+13+1.0
Total100%57 (F)56 (F)+1+1.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLinkedIn RecruiterPymetrics (Harver Games)
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain01—
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10Sources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain10Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain92Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Pymetrics (Harver Games) has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 9 with a source URL, 2 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter and Pymetrics (Harver Games) sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains, and 11 for Pymetrics (Harver Games), across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pymetrics (Harver Games) last reviewed
May 21, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.