HomeCompareLinkedIn Recruiter vs Saville Assessment

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

LinkedIn Recruiter vs Saville Assessment

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Saville Assessment by 9 points.

LinkedIn Recruiter scores 57 and Saville Assessment 48 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. LinkedIn Recruiter leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Saville Assessment leads 1, including FRIA Support. Even Article 11 Technical Documentation, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (LinkedIn Recruiter 67, Saville Assessment 50, 20% weight), is only 37% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

LinkedIn Recruiter is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Saville Assessment under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Saville Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordLinkedIn RecruiterSaville Assessment
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20022004

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 67 · Saville Assessment 50

    3.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 18% weight · 50% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Saville Assessment 42

    1.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 12% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Saville Assessment 38

    1.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 12% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    LinkedIn Recruiter 66 · Saville Assessment 55

    1.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    LinkedIn Recruiter 62 · Saville Assessment 55

    1.1 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 68 · Saville Assessment 60

    0.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    LinkedIn Recruiter 38 · Saville Assessment 40

    0.3 weighted points to Saville Assessment

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +9.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 9.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +9 beside that +9.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is LinkedIn Recruiter minus Saville Assessment.

CategoryWeightLinkedIn RecruiterSaville AssessmentΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6750+17+3.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5042+8+1.4
FRIA Support15%3840-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6255+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%6655+11+1.3
Post-Market Monitoring12%5038+12+1.4
Customer Documentation8%6860+8+0.6
Total100%57 (F)48 (F)+9+9.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLinkedIn RecruiterSaville Assessment
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain346Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Saville Assessment has 40 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter and Saville Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 79 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains, and 40 for Saville Assessment, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Saville Assessment last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.