HomeCompareLinkedIn Recruiter vs SHL

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

LinkedIn Recruiter vs SHL

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads SHL on 6 of the 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter scores 57 and SHL 51 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. LinkedIn Recruiter leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so SHL is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 LinkedIn Recruiter leads is Data Governance Disclosure, LinkedIn Recruiter 62 to SHL 58. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap (LinkedIn Recruiter 50, SHL 40) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Article 11 Technical Documentation at 20% (LinkedIn Recruiter 67, SHL 60), 23% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter builds across the 6 criteria it leads.

§ The record

LinkedIn Recruiter is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, SHL under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only SHL is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordLinkedIn RecruiterSHL
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20021977

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 23% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 67 · SHL 60

    1.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 15% weight · 43% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    LinkedIn Recruiter 38 · SHL 30

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 12% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · SHL 40

    1.2 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 12% weight · 79% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    LinkedIn Recruiter 66 · SHL 58

    1.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 8% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 68 · SHL 60

    0.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    LinkedIn Recruiter 62 · SHL 58

    0.6 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +6.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +6.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is LinkedIn Recruiter minus SHL.

CategoryWeightLinkedIn RecruiterSHLΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6760+7+1.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5050--
FRIA Support15%3830+8+1.2
Data Governance Disclosure15%6258+4+0.6
Human Oversight Design12%6658+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%5040+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%6860+8+0.6
Total100%57 (F)51 (F)+6+6.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLinkedIn RecruiterSHL
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain154Sources on the vendor's own domain

LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; SHL has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains, and 19 for SHL, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
SHL last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.