HomeCompareLinkedIn Recruiter vs Test Partnership

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

LinkedIn Recruiter vs Test Partnership

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

LinkedIn Recruiter leads Test Partnership on all 7 criteria.

LinkedIn Recruiter scores 57 and Test Partnership 50 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Sourcing and Assessment cohorts. LinkedIn Recruiter is ahead of Test Partnership on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Bias Audit Transparency at LinkedIn Recruiter 50 to Test Partnership 48. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (LinkedIn Recruiter 50, Test Partnership 33, 12% weight), but it accounts for only 30% of the weighted advantage LinkedIn Recruiter holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

LinkedIn Recruiter is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Test Partnership under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only Test Partnership is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordLinkedIn RecruiterTest Partnership
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSGB
Founded20022012

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 30% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Test Partnership 33

    2.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  2. 20% weight · 59% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 67 · Test Partnership 57

    2.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  3. 12% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    LinkedIn Recruiter 66 · Test Partnership 58

    1.0 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  4. 15% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    LinkedIn Recruiter 62 · Test Partnership 57

    0.8 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  5. 8% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    LinkedIn Recruiter 68 · Test Partnership 62

    0.5 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  6. 18% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    LinkedIn Recruiter 50 · Test Partnership 48

    0.4 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

  7. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    LinkedIn Recruiter 38 · Test Partnership 36

    0.3 weighted points to LinkedIn Recruiter

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +6.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +6.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is LinkedIn Recruiter minus Test Partnership.

CategoryWeightLinkedIn RecruiterTest PartnershipΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6757+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%5048+2+0.4
FRIA Support15%3836+2+0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6257+5+0.8
Human Oversight Design12%6658+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%5033+17+2.0
Customer Documentation8%6862+6+0.5
Total100%57 (F)50 (F)+7+6.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLinkedIn RecruiterTest Partnership
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%345Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain266Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

LinkedIn Recruiter has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 34 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Test Partnership has 32 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LinkedIn Recruiter and Test Partnership sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 71 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 39 for LinkedIn Recruiter, across 6 distinct source domains, and 32 for Test Partnership, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
LinkedIn Recruiter last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Test Partnership last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.