Side-by-side · Rubric js-v1.0
LockedIn AI vs Sensei AI
LockedIn AI
LockedIn AI is a real-time interview copilot that listens to a job seeker's live interview, coding round or online assessment and displays AI-generated answers, code and coaching on their screen, alongside free resume, cover-letter and job-tracking tools.
Substantial gaps
Live interview
Sensei AI
Sensei AI is a real-time interview copilot that listens to a candidate's live job interview, transcribes the interviewer's questions and displays structured, resume-tailored answers on screen in about a second, with an added coding copilot and AI resume builder.
Substantial gaps
Live interview
The result
Sensei AI leads LockedIn AI by 6 points.
Sensei AI scores 33 and LockedIn AI 27 under rubric js-v1.0 — a 6-point gap inside the Live interview cohort. The 7 criteria split 5 to 2 in favour of Sensei AI: Sensei AI is ahead on Employer & ATS Legitimacy and LockedIn AI on Data & Credential Safety. Even Employer & ATS Legitimacy, the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (LockedIn AI 10, Sensei AI 25, 15% weight), is only 32% of the weighted advantage Sensei AI builds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Criteria won
7 criteria
- LockedIn AI2
- Sensei AI5
- Widest raw gap
- Employer & ATS Legitimacy10 vs 25
- Heaviest weighted swing
- Employer & ATS Legitimacy15% weight
Keep this comparison
Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.
The record
Categories, scope and company facts.
LockedIn AI and Sensei AI are both filed under Live interview assistance. They also share 1 secondary category: Resume AI.
| Record | LockedIn AI | Sensei AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | High |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2024 | 2024 |
What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
- 1
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
15% weight27% of the movement so far
LockedIn AI10Sensei AI252.3 weighted points to Sensei AI
- 2
Application Honesty
20% weight46% of the movement so far
LockedIn AI12Sensei AI201.6 weighted points to Sensei AI
- 3
Effectiveness Evidence
12% weight63% of the movement so far
LockedIn AI10Sensei AI221.4 weighted points to Sensei AI
- 4
Data & Credential Safety
20% weight78% of the movement so far
LockedIn AI48Sensei AI421.2 weighted points to LockedIn AI
- 5
User Control & Transparency
15% weight92% of the movement so far
LockedIn AI40Sensei AI481.2 weighted points to Sensei AI
- 6
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
10% weight98% of the movement so far
LockedIn AI33Sensei AI380.5 weighted points to Sensei AI
- 7
Support & Accountability
8% weight100% of the movement so far
LockedIn AI40Sensei AI380.2 weighted points to LockedIn AI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.6.
Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is LockedIn AI minus Sensei AI, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.
| Category | Weight | LockedIn AI | Sensei AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 12 | 20 | -8 | -1.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 48 | 42 | +6 | +1.2 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 40 | 48 | -8 | -1.2 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 10 | 25 | -15 | -2.3 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 10 | 22 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 33 | 38 | -5 | -0.5 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 40 | 38 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27F | 33F | -6 | -5.6 |
Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | LockedIn AI | Sensei AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 26 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
LockedIn AI has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Sensei AI has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for LockedIn AI and Sensei AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 61 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for LockedIn AI, across 3 distinct source domains, and 31 for Sensei AI, across 8 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- LockedIn AI last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sensei AI last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
Where next
The full profiles
Scored against