§ The result
Maki People leads Loxo on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 puts 25 points between Maki People (Assessment) and Loxo (Sourcing): 62 (D) for Maki People, 37 (F) for Loxo. Maki People leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Loxo is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Maki People leads is Data Governance Disclosure, Loxo 50 to Maki People 62. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Loxo 20, Maki People 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 42% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Loxo
Loxo is an AI-native talent-intelligence platform that combines candidate sourcing, a recruiting CRM, and an applicant tracking system, using proprietary ranking models and a self-built talent graph of 800M+ people to source, rank, and match candidates for recruiting and staffing firms.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
Loxo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Maki People is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Loxo | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | FR |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 42% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Loxo 20 · Maki People 80
10.8 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Loxo 30 · Maki People 62
6.4 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 83% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Loxo 30 · Maki People 57
4.0 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Loxo 50 · Maki People 62
1.8 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Loxo 40 · Maki People 52
1.4 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Loxo 58 · Maki People 70
1.0 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -25.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 25.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -25 beside that -25.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Loxo minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | Loxo | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 62 | -32 | -6.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 20 | 80 | -60 | -10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 57 | -27 | -4.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 50 | 62 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 50 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 40 | 52 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 70 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 37 (F) | 62 (D) | -25 | -25.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Loxo | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 12 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 17 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Maki People has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain, and 22 for Maki People, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Loxo last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next