HomeCompareLoxo vs Paylocity

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Loxo vs Paylocity

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Paylocity leads Loxo on 4 of the 7 criteria.

Paylocity scores 43 and Loxo 37 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Paylocity leads 4 of the 7 criteria and the remaining 3 are level, so Loxo is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 4 Paylocity leads is Post-Market Monitoring, Loxo 40 to Paylocity 42. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Loxo 30, Paylocity 44 — and at a 20% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage Paylocity holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Loxo is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Paylocity under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and NYC LL 144. Only Paylocity is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordLoxoPaylocity
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20121997

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Loxo 30 · Paylocity 44

    2.8 weighted points to Paylocity

  2. 18% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Loxo 20 · Paylocity 33

    2.3 weighted points to Paylocity

  3. 15% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Loxo 50 · Paylocity 54

    0.6 weighted points to Paylocity

  4. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Loxo 40 · Paylocity 42

    0.2 weighted points to Paylocity

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -6.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -6.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Loxo minus Paylocity.

CategoryWeightLoxoPaylocityΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3044-14-2.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%2033-13-2.3
FRIA Support15%3030--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5054-4-0.6
Human Oversight Design12%5050--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4042-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%37 (F)43 (F)-6-6.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightLoxoPaylocity
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1111
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%1121Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%127Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain117Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Loxo has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Paylocity has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 37 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 19 for Loxo, across 1 distinct source domain, and 18 for Paylocity, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Loxo last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Paylocity last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.