§ The result
Maki People leads Pulsifi on all 7 criteria.
Rubric v1.0 separates Maki People and Pulsifi, both Assessment entries, by 34 points: 67 (D) for Maki People, 33 (F) for Pulsifi. Pulsifi leads none of the 7 criteria, and Maki People is ahead on 6 of them by 20 raw points or more, Bias Audit Transparency among them. The advantage Maki People holds is spread out: Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Maki People 80, Pulsifi 20, 18% weight), yet it supplies only 32% of the weighted points Maki People gains across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
Vendor profile
Pulsifi
Pulsifi gives candidates and employees 0-100 Role Fit and Organizational Fit scores that combine personality, work-interest, work-culture and cognitive assessments with AI resume and skills analysis, and uses the scores to rank people for hiring, internal mobility and succession.
§ The record
Maki People and Pulsifi are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Screening and Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Maki People | Pulsifi |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | FR | SG |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 32% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Maki People 80 · Pulsifi 20
10.8 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Maki People 64 · Pulsifi 30
6.8 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 69% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Maki People 62 · Pulsifi 25
5.5 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Maki People 64 · Pulsifi 40
3.6 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 89% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Maki People 55 · Pulsifi 28
3.2 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Maki People 74 · Pulsifi 46
2.2 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Maki People 66 · Pulsifi 55
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +33.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 33.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +34 beside that +33.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Maki People minus Pulsifi.
| Category | Weight | Maki People | Pulsifi | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 64 | 30 | +34 | +6.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 80 | 20 | +60 | +10.8 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 62 | 25 | +37 | +5.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 64 | 40 | +24 | +3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 66 | 55 | +11 | +1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 28 | +27 | +3.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 74 | 46 | +28 | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 67 (D) | 33 (F) | +34 | +33.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Maki People | Pulsifi | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 26 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Pulsifi has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 26 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains, and 33 for Pulsifi, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Pulsifi last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next